Steve Madden Madden Madden Womens Jaydun Boot- Pick SZ/Color. 93c2f6

Steve Madden Madden Madden Womens Jaydun Boot- Pick SZ/Color. 93c2f6

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
UPC: 0715924281489
Style: Causal Brand: Steve Madden
US Shoe Size (Women's): Multiple Variations Model: JAYDUN
Size Type: Regular MPN: JAYDUN
U.S. Cities City-Data Forum Index
Search Forums  (Advanced)

Steve Madden Madden Madden Womens Jaydun Boot- Pick SZ/Color. 93c2f6

Kelsi Dagger Brooklyn Harmans Knee-High Fashion Boots, Latte,Salvatore Ferragamo- Tatum (0210268)  Size 9- 7cm Block Heel. BRAND NEW,Donald Pliner Gale Black Embossed Leather Trim Buckle Suede Knee High Boot 6JIMMY CHOO Black Leather Ankle Boots Sz 9.5NEW Sz 6 MACIE BEAN WOMEN'S COPPER BROWN FLORAL ROPER GIRL BOOTS western cowgirl,33 New Nike Vandal 2X Platform Womens Size 6.5 Gym Blue Summit White AO2868-400,Lucky Brand Womens Sorita Leather Open Toe Ankle Fashion Boots, Dk Tan, Size 9.5,Caterpillar Women's Devlin Waterproof Fur Winter Boot, Black, 5.5 M US Free ShipFrye Leather Boots Cognac Pull On Mid Calf Size 9NEW* Stuart Weitzman Black Leather Belted Moto Boot 10.5 M (MSRP$250+),Dansko Fyodora Chestnut Brown Suede/Faux Fur Winter Boots -Size 36 (US 6)- NWB,New DANNER 62264 Mountain Low 600 Women's 8 Gray / Plum Hiking Boot RETAIL $160Twisted X Women Western Tooled Green/ Pink Brown Leather Cowboy Boots Size 7 B,NEW!! Aquatalia 'Galia Bootie- Black Suede- Size 12 M $498 (BB2),Via Spiga- Women's Black Starie Boot Sz:8.5M,Womens Turquoise Mid Calf Leather Pull On Cowboy Boots Riding Rodeo Square,** Frye Addie Double Zip Bootie Suede Womens 9 1/2 B New nubuck ivory boots,Boot Born Cuatros Black Full Grain Leather,Bed Stu Women's Ravine Steel Blue Rustic Ankle Boot,WOMEN'S SHOES SNEAKERS DR. MARTENS PASCAL BLACK NOIR [13512006],Authentic Dolce & Gabbana Ankle Boot Black Suede, Sz. US 8/IT 39.5NEW Dolce Vita Sz 9.5 Boots Womens SILAS Over the Knee $300 Khaki Suede Tall 2"naturalizer Dev Riding Boots, Saddle Tan, 7.5 W US,FRYE Wood Brown Suede Cara Short Pull on Boot NEW Size 6 Style 3478321,Cloud Aline Red Leather Plush Wool Slip On Ankle Bootie Comfort Shoe 41NewWomens Beige Glitter Inlay Cowgirl Boots Distressed Leather Western Fashion Snip,Gentlemen/Ladies John Fluvog Rubens Size 7 Complete specification range First batch of customers Human border,Man/Woman Ariat Geneva Womens Shoe- Choose SZ/Color. Packaging diversity stable quality various kinds,Ralph Lauren Collection Black Suede Pointed Toe Zip Up Boots Size 11,Harley-Davidson Women's ABBEY leather and suede BLACK Boots D83865,
Location: Lethbridge, AB
1,132 posts, read 1,594,386 times
Reputation: 974
Mostly because fighting's been a part of hockey for its entire history as a sport, so anyone wanting to ban fighting in hockey is pushing against an entrenched tradition, whereas the opposite is true in basketball.

As well, given its long history in hockey, fighting is governed by a fairly stringent set of official and unofficial rules (for example, it's considered proper fighting etiquette to remove a visor if you're wearing one, or perhaps most important - if a player refuses to drop the gloves, there's no fight)

Fighting also serves as an unofficial deterrent to dirty play. That's one of the primary duties of an enforcer on a team - to ensure that their team mates do not have to put up with that sort of play (Running a goalie, for example is almost a surefire way to start a fight).

Given that basketball has no history of fighting, and no real rules to govern it (official or unofficial) and much more stringent rules in regards to physical play it doesn't make a lot of sense to suddenly include fighting.
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,024 posts, read 10,083,339 times
Reputation: 8860
I'll tell you this.... Since the league has clamped down on fighting with the instagator rule the game has gotten a lot more dangerous. Back in the day when you Did something really dirty to your opponent you had better drop those gloves because you were going to have to fight for sure. Nowadays we see all kinds of dirty whimps out there running around the ice and injuring players and these guys refuse to fight. Well in the old days you would have got your lights punched out whether you wanted to fight or not. Retaliation, was the name of the game and it made it safer for the clean players.
Old 04-07-2011, 08:13 PM
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,346 posts, read 80,485,974 times
Reputation: 17405
Invalid question. Hockey players are not allowed to fight.

The real question is, "Why doesn't fighting int he NHL result in much harsher penalties?" Are fights this common in Europe or Russia?

Also, fist blows in hockey can't be delivered with as much force because a player has less ability to use his body and legs since he is on skates.

If I had it my way, fighting in the NHL would result in penalties equivalent to those in all other team sports. Hard checks could still be delivered just like hard hits in football can still be delivered.
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because the NBA is better run and the NHL is circling the bowl by comparison.

Hey, let's get all our stars hurt! yay! That will help our sport grow right?

I would love to see some enforcer on an NHL team learn how to really fight and put an arm lock on a guy and dislocate his elbow etc. Seriously, they've let guys smash other guys throats and heads with sticks and end peoples careers this way....I mean at what point do we just send them out there without goals or pucks and let them just fight?
Location: Kansas City, MO
5,758 posts, read 9,455,177 times
Reputation: 2790
I've played roller hockey and I have seen guys hospitalized after getting punched one time. If you know how to handle yourself on skates, you can punch just fine.
04-08-2011, 04:57 PM
I've played hockey and been a hockey fan for over 40 years. However I am a guy who has always had hockey as a secondary sport. Having laid that groundwork, there is fighting in the NHL because there is a tradition of it, as another poster said. However these days fighting has its problems. Helmets, an addition to the NHL after the advent of common fighting, creates problems. A punch to the helmet can do more damage to the hand than to the helmeted head being hit. Consequently some fighters take it easy when the helmet is likely to be hit. And visors, which might become manditory someday soon, will create yet more problems for the fighting hockey player.

To tell you the truth, I think they could ban fighting in the NHL and the sport could survive just fine. The heirarchy is probably unwilling to take the gamble. And given hockey is a secondary "major" sport in the US (but bigger than soccer, so far), it would be a gamble.
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because hockey fights are entertaining.

Basketball fights just look ridiculous.
Location: Tall Building down by the river
39,615 posts, read 48,179,614 times
Reputation: 9451

Why do the NBA fights look ridiculous?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site:

Closed Thread

All times are GMT -6.