Nike Air Force One Size Size Size 10.5 Beige Desert camo b060c7

Nike Air Force One Size Size Size 10.5 Beige Desert camo b060c7

Item specifics

Pre-owned: An item that has been used or worn previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and ... Read moreabout the condition


Pattern: Camouflage Product Line: Nike Air
Width: Medium (D, M) Model:

Air Force 1 AF1 Low

Features: Retro US Shoe Size (Men's): 10.5


Style: Athletic Sneakers
U.S. Cities City-Data Forum Index
Search Forums  (Advanced)

Nike Air Force One Size Size Size 10.5 Beige Desert camo b060c7

New Nike Free RN Flyknit FK Men's Running Training Shoes Khaki Green 831069 301,Nike Men's Air Force Max 2013 Shoes DAMAGED White/Red-Black 555105-100: sz. 9Nike Air Zoom Talaria Mid Flyknit Premium Palm Green/Legion 875784-300Nike Hypervenom Phantom 3 Club FG Crimson/Metallic Dark Grey/Wolf Grey 4145600,Nike Mens Air Max 90 Ultra 2.0 Flyknit Medium Olive Size 11,2009 Nike Jordan 6 Rings Olympic 322992-161 White Varsity Red Size 9.5,Nike Hypervenomx Proximo SE IC Soled Honey Halls 835366-200 SiZE 11.5 / 45.5,Nike SB Blazer Premium SE Summit White Sz 5 NIB 631042-100Nike Zoom Field General Oregon Men's Active Shoe 654859 371 Size 9.5,Nike Kobe XI TB Promo Basketball Shoes Maroon Red Ice Silver SZ 14 (856485-662)Nike SB Dunk Low Pro "Boca Jr's" Varsity Royal/Lightning Gum Light 854866-471Nike Air Zoom Spiridon '16 White Team Orange-Black Men's Shoes 926955 106 SZ 12MEN'S NIKE NSW TIEMPO '94 MID QS BLACK/VARSITY ROYAL 641147 041 SIZE 11 US,2016 Nike Air Jordan 10 X Retro Black NYC New York City Size 10.5 (310805-012),Nike Air Jordan 3 III True Blue Nike Air 854261 106 Air Max BG GS sz 6.5 YNike Dunk Low Pro IW Ishod Wair Sz 7 100% Authentic Retro SB Royal 819674 416,Nike Lebron XIII 13 Low Limited (Men's Size 8.5) Phantom Olive Orange 849783-002,318429-111 Nike Air Huarache Mens ALL WHITE TRIPLE White Yeezy Trainers Running,Converse Chuck Taylor All Star Men's Hi Top Woven Trainers Shoes in WhiteUOMO Nike Air Force 1 Scarpe Grigio Platino Bianco 488298 090Nike Benassi Duo Ultra SLD/Pigalle Blue/ Royal-White Nike Lab 902783-400,NIKE KD TREY 5 III Men's Basketball Shoes Gray Black Citrus 749377-002 Size 9,Nike Manoa Leather Work Boots Haystack Weather 454350-700 Mens Size 11,Nike - Blazer Low GT | Mens Skate Shoes - 943849-010 | Black / WhiteNIKE AIR MAX 1 ULTRA 2.0 ESSENTIAL 875679-200 MEDIUM OLIVE GREEN DS SIZE: 10New Size 12.5 Nike Mens Free RN Distance Shield Running Shoes Yellow 849660-700,NIKE Zoom KD9 Elite Men Basketball Shoes Size 11 Black 878637-007,MENS NIKE SB Zoom Dunk High Pro Black Green 854851 330 EU39 US6.5New Men's Nike Metcon 3 Size 12 Red Black Grey White Training Shoes,Nike Air Max Mercurial 98 Wolf Grey/Racer Blue Men's Size 12 818675-004 NIB $130,
Location: Lethbridge, AB
1,132 posts, read 1,594,386 times
Reputation: 974
Mostly because fighting's been a part of hockey for its entire history as a sport, so anyone wanting to ban fighting in hockey is pushing against an entrenched tradition, whereas the opposite is true in basketball.

As well, given its long history in hockey, fighting is governed by a fairly stringent set of official and unofficial rules (for example, it's considered proper fighting etiquette to remove a visor if you're wearing one, or perhaps most important - if a player refuses to drop the gloves, there's no fight)

Fighting also serves as an unofficial deterrent to dirty play. That's one of the primary duties of an enforcer on a team - to ensure that their team mates do not have to put up with that sort of play (Running a goalie, for example is almost a surefire way to start a fight).

Given that basketball has no history of fighting, and no real rules to govern it (official or unofficial) and much more stringent rules in regards to physical play it doesn't make a lot of sense to suddenly include fighting.
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,024 posts, read 10,083,339 times
Reputation: 8860
I'll tell you this.... Since the league has clamped down on fighting with the instagator rule the game has gotten a lot more dangerous. Back in the day when you Did something really dirty to your opponent you had better drop those gloves because you were going to have to fight for sure. Nowadays we see all kinds of dirty whimps out there running around the ice and injuring players and these guys refuse to fight. Well in the old days you would have got your lights punched out whether you wanted to fight or not. Retaliation, was the name of the game and it made it safer for the clean players.
Old 04-07-2011, 08:13 PM
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,346 posts, read 80,485,974 times
Reputation: 17405
Invalid question. Hockey players are not allowed to fight.

The real question is, "Why doesn't fighting int he NHL result in much harsher penalties?" Are fights this common in Europe or Russia?

Also, fist blows in hockey can't be delivered with as much force because a player has less ability to use his body and legs since he is on skates.

If I had it my way, fighting in the NHL would result in penalties equivalent to those in all other team sports. Hard checks could still be delivered just like hard hits in football can still be delivered.
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because the NBA is better run and the NHL is circling the bowl by comparison.

Hey, let's get all our stars hurt! yay! That will help our sport grow right?

I would love to see some enforcer on an NHL team learn how to really fight and put an arm lock on a guy and dislocate his elbow etc. Seriously, they've let guys smash other guys throats and heads with sticks and end peoples careers this way....I mean at what point do we just send them out there without goals or pucks and let them just fight?
Location: Kansas City, MO
5,758 posts, read 9,455,177 times
Reputation: 2790
I've played roller hockey and I have seen guys hospitalized after getting punched one time. If you know how to handle yourself on skates, you can punch just fine.
04-08-2011, 04:57 PM
I've played hockey and been a hockey fan for over 40 years. However I am a guy who has always had hockey as a secondary sport. Having laid that groundwork, there is fighting in the NHL because there is a tradition of it, as another poster said. However these days fighting has its problems. Helmets, an addition to the NHL after the advent of common fighting, creates problems. A punch to the helmet can do more damage to the hand than to the helmeted head being hit. Consequently some fighters take it easy when the helmet is likely to be hit. And visors, which might become manditory someday soon, will create yet more problems for the fighting hockey player.

To tell you the truth, I think they could ban fighting in the NHL and the sport could survive just fine. The heirarchy is probably unwilling to take the gamble. And given hockey is a secondary "major" sport in the US (but bigger than soccer, so far), it would be a gamble.
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because hockey fights are entertaining.

Basketball fights just look ridiculous.
Location: Tall Building down by the river
39,615 posts, read 48,179,614 times
Reputation: 9451

Why do the NBA fights look ridiculous?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site:

Closed Thread

All times are GMT -6.