Nike Air Force One Size Size Size 10.5 Beige Desert camo b060c7

Nike Air Force One Size Size Size 10.5 Beige Desert camo b060c7

Item specifics

Pre-owned: An item that has been used or worn previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and ... Read moreabout the condition


Pattern: Camouflage Product Line: Nike Air
Width: Medium (D, M) Model:

Air Force 1 AF1 Low

Features: Retro US Shoe Size (Men's): 10.5


Style: Athletic Sneakers
U.S. Cities City-Data Forum Index
Search Forums  (Advanced)

Nike Air Force One Size Size Size 10.5 Beige Desert camo b060c7

NIKE Rosherun GPX sz 13 Vintage Green Gamma Tiger Stripes Premium Roshe,Nike Hyperchase Premium Men's Basketball Shoes Size 10 Crimson Red (705369-601),Nike Air Force 1 Mid Retro Prm Jewel Men's Sz 9 NEW 941913 600 High Low SF QSNike Jordan flight Time 14.5, Black / White / Tropical Teal , Lunarlon, Sz 12Nike Air Max Tavas Black & White Trainers Size,Nike HyperLive Andre Igoudala PE Size 8.5 864129074,Nike Shox Gravity AR1999-100 White Men's Sportswear Running Shoes Size 11 NEW!,Nike Air Jordan First Class Mens Basketball Trainers Size,Nike Women's LunarCharge Essential -Gray over Gray Sz 10 Retail: $119,NIKE SCARPA SNEAKER UOMO GRIGIO ART. NIKE ZOOM STEFAN JANOSKI CNVS 615957 200,NIKE AIR ZOOM MARIAH FLYNIT RACER BLACK DESERT MOSS UK6/US7/EU40 918264 004 BNIB,NEW NIKE KOBE AD UNIVERSITY RED BASKETBALL SHOES XI 1 ELITE 852425-608 MENS 10.5,NIKE ROSHE LD-1000 QS. Platinum Obsidian Wolf Grey SZ 11. NEW & 100% ORIGINAL,NIKE SB AIR MAX BRUIN VAPOR MEN'S TRAINERS SIZE,Men's Brand New Air Zoom Talaria '16 Athletic Fashion Sneakers [844695 003],New Men's Nike Cortez Basic Nylon Size 8 Clay Green Blue White Running Shoes,Men's LeBron Witness II Basketball Shoe 942518-011 BLACK/WHITE Multiple SizesNike Men's Roshe One Running Shoes,Nike Vapor Speed Lunarlons Turf Training Shoes Green/White Sz 12.5 110$ MSRP,371739-200 Nike Men Air Trainer Ii Shoe Vachetta TanNike SB Dunk Low Pro Deconstructed Black/White/Anthracite - 8-12 NWT AA4275-002,NIKE AIR MAX 95 PREMIUM SE 924478-201 VACHETTA TAN ELEMENTAL GOLD BROWN,Nike Air Jordan Formula 23 (881465-010) UK:12Nike Tiempo Legend VI FG Black Hyper Turquoise Rare SZ 7.5-Womens 9 (819177-004),Nike DUNK LOW PRO SB Obsidian Team Red Skate Discounted (273) Men's Shoes,NIKE Flyknit Trainer Squadron Blue Blue Glow White 2013,DS MENS NIKE AIR JORDAN HORIZON WOLF GREY & DARK GREY 823581 013 Sz 11.5,Nike Air Safari QS AO3295-001 Black Monarch Orange Jungle Flashback Retro DS NEW,Nike Air Pegasus 89 Premium SE men lifestyle casual sneakers NEW 857935-400Nike Blazer Low PRM QS SB Country Club 874688 441 Nav/Wh Men's Sz 13 NEW NoLid,
Location: Lethbridge, AB
1,132 posts, read 1,594,386 times
Reputation: 974
Mostly because fighting's been a part of hockey for its entire history as a sport, so anyone wanting to ban fighting in hockey is pushing against an entrenched tradition, whereas the opposite is true in basketball.

As well, given its long history in hockey, fighting is governed by a fairly stringent set of official and unofficial rules (for example, it's considered proper fighting etiquette to remove a visor if you're wearing one, or perhaps most important - if a player refuses to drop the gloves, there's no fight)

Fighting also serves as an unofficial deterrent to dirty play. That's one of the primary duties of an enforcer on a team - to ensure that their team mates do not have to put up with that sort of play (Running a goalie, for example is almost a surefire way to start a fight).

Given that basketball has no history of fighting, and no real rules to govern it (official or unofficial) and much more stringent rules in regards to physical play it doesn't make a lot of sense to suddenly include fighting.
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,024 posts, read 10,083,339 times
Reputation: 8860
I'll tell you this.... Since the league has clamped down on fighting with the instagator rule the game has gotten a lot more dangerous. Back in the day when you Did something really dirty to your opponent you had better drop those gloves because you were going to have to fight for sure. Nowadays we see all kinds of dirty whimps out there running around the ice and injuring players and these guys refuse to fight. Well in the old days you would have got your lights punched out whether you wanted to fight or not. Retaliation, was the name of the game and it made it safer for the clean players.
Old 04-07-2011, 08:13 PM
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,346 posts, read 80,485,974 times
Reputation: 17405
Invalid question. Hockey players are not allowed to fight.

The real question is, "Why doesn't fighting int he NHL result in much harsher penalties?" Are fights this common in Europe or Russia?

Also, fist blows in hockey can't be delivered with as much force because a player has less ability to use his body and legs since he is on skates.

If I had it my way, fighting in the NHL would result in penalties equivalent to those in all other team sports. Hard checks could still be delivered just like hard hits in football can still be delivered.
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because the NBA is better run and the NHL is circling the bowl by comparison.

Hey, let's get all our stars hurt! yay! That will help our sport grow right?

I would love to see some enforcer on an NHL team learn how to really fight and put an arm lock on a guy and dislocate his elbow etc. Seriously, they've let guys smash other guys throats and heads with sticks and end peoples careers this way....I mean at what point do we just send them out there without goals or pucks and let them just fight?
Location: Kansas City, MO
5,758 posts, read 9,455,177 times
Reputation: 2790
I've played roller hockey and I have seen guys hospitalized after getting punched one time. If you know how to handle yourself on skates, you can punch just fine.
04-08-2011, 04:57 PM
I've played hockey and been a hockey fan for over 40 years. However I am a guy who has always had hockey as a secondary sport. Having laid that groundwork, there is fighting in the NHL because there is a tradition of it, as another poster said. However these days fighting has its problems. Helmets, an addition to the NHL after the advent of common fighting, creates problems. A punch to the helmet can do more damage to the hand than to the helmeted head being hit. Consequently some fighters take it easy when the helmet is likely to be hit. And visors, which might become manditory someday soon, will create yet more problems for the fighting hockey player.

To tell you the truth, I think they could ban fighting in the NHL and the sport could survive just fine. The heirarchy is probably unwilling to take the gamble. And given hockey is a secondary "major" sport in the US (but bigger than soccer, so far), it would be a gamble.
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because hockey fights are entertaining.

Basketball fights just look ridiculous.
Location: Tall Building down by the river
39,615 posts, read 48,179,614 times
Reputation: 9451

Why do the NBA fights look ridiculous?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site:

Closed Thread

All times are GMT -6.