NIKE TANJUN PREM SHOES 917537 601 NO BX TOP 7b907b

NIKE TANJUN PREM SHOES 917537 601 NO BX    TOP 7b907b

Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Style: running, cross training
Width: Medium (B, M) US Shoe Size (Women's): US 6
Color:

Multi-Color

Product Line: TANJUN
Brand:

NIKE

UPC:

Does not apply

U.S. Cities City-Data Forum Index
Search Forums  (Advanced)

NIKE TANJUN PREM SHOES 917537 601 NO BX TOP 7b907b

Nike Air Force 1 Mid Premium "Metallic Pack" 805292 002 ~ UK Size 5.5 ~ Euro 39NWT Nike Womens Running Shoes Size 8,WOMENS NIKE AIR FORCE AF1 1 07 SEASONAL TRAINERS BLACK 818594003,Nike Dunk High Alabaster Sail Zest 325203 711 Size 11 Womens 9.5 Mens Jordan I,Nike Air Max 1 Lunaire Hyperfuse Neuf en Box 100% Authentique 1/97 90 95 98,Nike Air Presto Lots QS Running “RIO OLYMPIC” Trainers US 12,Wmns Nike Air Woven Polarized Blue Sport Fuchsia Women Shoes Slip-On 302350-400Nike Metcon Repper DSX Women's Training Shoe 902173 003 Size 9.5NIKE AIR MAX TAVAS Women's Running shoes NEW MSRP $90 916791 003 Metallic SilverWOMENS NIKE AIR PEGASUS 89 TECH PRINT SIZE 4.5 (861693 001) BLACK/ WHITE,Nike Womens Air Max 90 White Gray Purple Running Shoes 318860-101 Size 8.5WOMENS NIKE AIR ZOOM FEARLESS FLYKNIT METALLIC SIZE 8 (922883 001),2018 WMNS Nike Air Presto SZ 10.5 Sail Hyper Crimson Menta AQ0533-100,nike air max Motion Racer 2 WomensWomen's Nike Roshe Two Knit Sneakers size 8,Nike Blazer Luxury Satin Velvet Triple Sail White Trainers Men Women Size 5 5.5,AIR ZOOM FEARLESS FLYKNIT TRAINING SHOES CRIMSON 850426 800 US 6.5,Nike Wmns Flyknit Zoom Agility Black White 698616-004 oreo htm trainerUNISEX CONVERSE CHUCK TAYLOR MA-1 ZIP ALTO - 149394c - Scarpe Sportive Bianche e,Womens Nike Air Max 90 Ultra 2.0 Flyknit MultiColor SZ 12 Mens 10.5 (881109-001)Nike Wmns Zoom Condition TR Black White Women Training Shoes Sneakers 852472-001,Nike Womens Air Max 90 Anniversary "Cork" Running Shoe size 5BNIB YOUNGS NIKE SB DUNK HIGH TRD QS RARE UGLY SWEATER %AUT 881758 446Womens Ladies Trainers Nike Free RN Distance Shield,NIKE WOMENS LODEN SZ 9 LIGHT BONE COOL GREY GUM BROWN OFF WHITE 896298 008,Women Nike Air Max Thea Ultra FK Running Shoes Sz US 7/8 Purple White 881175 500,Nike Women's Free Rn Flyknit 2017 New Girls Training Grey/Pink Shoes 881974 001,Baby Pink Suede Air Force Ones,Nike Air Max Motion Women's TRAINERS SIZE (43) 819957 031,WOMEN,S AIR JORDAN 1 FLIGHT 5 PREMIUM TRAINERS 881438-002 BNIB 15,
 
 
Location: Lethbridge, AB
1,132 posts, read 1,594,386 times
Reputation: 974
Mostly because fighting's been a part of hockey for its entire history as a sport, so anyone wanting to ban fighting in hockey is pushing against an entrenched tradition, whereas the opposite is true in basketball.

As well, given its long history in hockey, fighting is governed by a fairly stringent set of official and unofficial rules (for example, it's considered proper fighting etiquette to remove a visor if you're wearing one, or perhaps most important - if a player refuses to drop the gloves, there's no fight)

Fighting also serves as an unofficial deterrent to dirty play. That's one of the primary duties of an enforcer on a team - to ensure that their team mates do not have to put up with that sort of play (Running a goalie, for example is almost a surefire way to start a fight).

Given that basketball has no history of fighting, and no real rules to govern it (official or unofficial) and much more stringent rules in regards to physical play it doesn't make a lot of sense to suddenly include fighting.
 
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,024 posts, read 10,083,339 times
Reputation: 8860
I'll tell you this.... Since the league has clamped down on fighting with the instagator rule the game has gotten a lot more dangerous. Back in the day when you Did something really dirty to your opponent you had better drop those gloves because you were going to have to fight for sure. Nowadays we see all kinds of dirty whimps out there running around the ice and injuring players and these guys refuse to fight. Well in the old days you would have got your lights punched out whether you wanted to fight or not. Retaliation, was the name of the game and it made it safer for the clean players.
 
Old 04-07-2011, 08:13 PM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,346 posts, read 80,485,974 times
Reputation: 17405
Quote:
Invalid question. Hockey players are not allowed to fight.

The real question is, "Why doesn't fighting int he NHL result in much harsher penalties?" Are fights this common in Europe or Russia?

Also, fist blows in hockey can't be delivered with as much force because a player has less ability to use his body and legs since he is on skates.

If I had it my way, fighting in the NHL would result in penalties equivalent to those in all other team sports. Hard checks could still be delivered just like hard hits in football can still be delivered.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because the NBA is better run and the NHL is circling the bowl by comparison.

Hey, let's get all our stars hurt! yay! That will help our sport grow right?

I would love to see some enforcer on an NHL team learn how to really fight and put an arm lock on a guy and dislocate his elbow etc. Seriously, they've let guys smash other guys throats and heads with sticks and end peoples careers this way....I mean at what point do we just send them out there without goals or pucks and let them just fight?
 
Location: Kansas City, MO
5,758 posts, read 9,455,177 times
Reputation: 2790
Quote:
I've played roller hockey and I have seen guys hospitalized after getting punched one time. If you know how to handle yourself on skates, you can punch just fine.
 
04-08-2011, 04:57 PM
I've played hockey and been a hockey fan for over 40 years. However I am a guy who has always had hockey as a secondary sport. Having laid that groundwork, there is fighting in the NHL because there is a tradition of it, as another poster said. However these days fighting has its problems. Helmets, an addition to the NHL after the advent of common fighting, creates problems. A punch to the helmet can do more damage to the hand than to the helmeted head being hit. Consequently some fighters take it easy when the helmet is likely to be hit. And visors, which might become manditory someday soon, will create yet more problems for the fighting hockey player.

To tell you the truth, I think they could ban fighting in the NHL and the sport could survive just fine. The heirarchy is probably unwilling to take the gamble. And given hockey is a secondary "major" sport in the US (but bigger than soccer, so far), it would be a gamble.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because hockey fights are entertaining.

Basketball fights just look ridiculous.
 
 
Location: Tall Building down by the river
39,615 posts, read 48,179,614 times
Reputation: 9451
Quote:

Why do the NBA fights look ridiculous?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread



All times are GMT -6.