Adidas Neo Label VS W Pace W VS Black White Pink Women Shoes Sneakers Trainers Size 7 98cba0

Adidas Neo Label VS W Pace W VS Black White Pink Women Shoes Sneakers Trainers Size 7 98cba0

Item specifics

New without box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or ... Read moreabout the condition
Style: Trainers


US Shoe Size (Women's): 7



Does not apply

U.S. Cities City-Data Forum Index
Search Forums  (Advanced)

Adidas Neo Label VS W Pace W VS Black White Pink Women Shoes Sneakers Trainers Size 7 98cba0

Asics Men’s Lethal Scrum Football Boots Multicolour (Black/White/Vermilion),PUMA Men's Powertech Blaze Met Nm Running Shoe - Choose SZ/ColorMens Real Leather Floral Fashion Trainers Athletics Sneakers Casual Board Shoes,Latest - Asics Gel GT 1000 6 Mens Running Shoes (D) (9090),ASICS Men's Gel Exalt 3 Running Shoe - Choose SZ/Color,Asics Gel Saga x Foot Patrol Camel Blue Ronnie Fieg H20RK size 10.5 11 11.5Florsheim Men's Sonic Penny Loafer Oxford Mens Size 12 Navy Blue Brush Off 17481,adidas Crazytrain Bounce - Black - Womens,Nike Air Max Ultra 2.0 Essential Killer Whale Size,PUMA Suede Classic Emboss Barbados Cherry Red Mens Sneakers Tennis ShoesAsics Tiger Gel-Lyte Trainers Beige Grey F0211,Men's Asics Kayano 23 Running Shoe,Armani Trainers 935565CC502 Mens NewPuma Blaze Of Glory OG x Staple "STAPLES" - 361616 01,Adidas Superstar Metal Toe Womens Shoe Size 6,Puma Suede Classic x Big Sean limited edition size 10.5 brand new.,Adidas Energy Boost Icon Miami Hurricanes PE Omaha Baseball Cleats SZ ( AQ7638 ),Puma Drift Cat 5 SF Scuderia Ferrari black red white Leather Men's Sneakers shoe,Vans x FOG - Fear Of God Mountain Edition 35 Size 10,NIke Womens Free RN Motion Flyknit Running Trainers 834585 401 Sneakers Shoes,Asics Gel-Sonoma 3 G-TX III Gore-Tex Gold Black Men Running Shoes T727N-0490PUMA SUEDE CLASSIC BASKETS UNISEXE 352634 03,Adidas Original ZX FLUX SMOOTH Women's Shoes NEW AUTHENTIC Black /White S82884Asics Gel-Nimbus 20 2E Wide Men Running Shoes Sneakers Trainers Pick 1,PUMA Men's Basket Classic Weatherproof Sneaker,Puma Cell Meio Black & Acacia Leather Athletic Shoes Sneakers Mens 11.5 NIB,Puma Unisex Adults’ Evospeed Nf Euro 4 Multisport Indoor Shoes 8.5,PUMA Men's Ignite 3 Pwrcool Cross-Trainer Shoe,[366320-02] MENS PUMA SUEDE CLASSIC X FUBU,adidas ATHLETICS B Khaki - Womens - Size 8 B
Location: Lethbridge, AB
1,132 posts, read 1,594,386 times
Reputation: 974
Mostly because fighting's been a part of hockey for its entire history as a sport, so anyone wanting to ban fighting in hockey is pushing against an entrenched tradition, whereas the opposite is true in basketball.

As well, given its long history in hockey, fighting is governed by a fairly stringent set of official and unofficial rules (for example, it's considered proper fighting etiquette to remove a visor if you're wearing one, or perhaps most important - if a player refuses to drop the gloves, there's no fight)

Fighting also serves as an unofficial deterrent to dirty play. That's one of the primary duties of an enforcer on a team - to ensure that their team mates do not have to put up with that sort of play (Running a goalie, for example is almost a surefire way to start a fight).

Given that basketball has no history of fighting, and no real rules to govern it (official or unofficial) and much more stringent rules in regards to physical play it doesn't make a lot of sense to suddenly include fighting.
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,024 posts, read 10,083,339 times
Reputation: 8860
I'll tell you this.... Since the league has clamped down on fighting with the instagator rule the game has gotten a lot more dangerous. Back in the day when you Did something really dirty to your opponent you had better drop those gloves because you were going to have to fight for sure. Nowadays we see all kinds of dirty whimps out there running around the ice and injuring players and these guys refuse to fight. Well in the old days you would have got your lights punched out whether you wanted to fight or not. Retaliation, was the name of the game and it made it safer for the clean players.
Old 04-07-2011, 08:13 PM
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,346 posts, read 80,485,974 times
Reputation: 17405
Invalid question. Hockey players are not allowed to fight.

The real question is, "Why doesn't fighting int he NHL result in much harsher penalties?" Are fights this common in Europe or Russia?

Also, fist blows in hockey can't be delivered with as much force because a player has less ability to use his body and legs since he is on skates.

If I had it my way, fighting in the NHL would result in penalties equivalent to those in all other team sports. Hard checks could still be delivered just like hard hits in football can still be delivered.
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because the NBA is better run and the NHL is circling the bowl by comparison.

Hey, let's get all our stars hurt! yay! That will help our sport grow right?

I would love to see some enforcer on an NHL team learn how to really fight and put an arm lock on a guy and dislocate his elbow etc. Seriously, they've let guys smash other guys throats and heads with sticks and end peoples careers this way....I mean at what point do we just send them out there without goals or pucks and let them just fight?
Location: Kansas City, MO
5,758 posts, read 9,455,177 times
Reputation: 2790
I've played roller hockey and I have seen guys hospitalized after getting punched one time. If you know how to handle yourself on skates, you can punch just fine.
04-08-2011, 04:57 PM
I've played hockey and been a hockey fan for over 40 years. However I am a guy who has always had hockey as a secondary sport. Having laid that groundwork, there is fighting in the NHL because there is a tradition of it, as another poster said. However these days fighting has its problems. Helmets, an addition to the NHL after the advent of common fighting, creates problems. A punch to the helmet can do more damage to the hand than to the helmeted head being hit. Consequently some fighters take it easy when the helmet is likely to be hit. And visors, which might become manditory someday soon, will create yet more problems for the fighting hockey player.

To tell you the truth, I think they could ban fighting in the NHL and the sport could survive just fine. The heirarchy is probably unwilling to take the gamble. And given hockey is a secondary "major" sport in the US (but bigger than soccer, so far), it would be a gamble.
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because hockey fights are entertaining.

Basketball fights just look ridiculous.
Location: Tall Building down by the river
39,615 posts, read 48,179,614 times
Reputation: 9451

Why do the NBA fights look ridiculous?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site:

Closed Thread

All times are GMT -6.