Adidas Originals GS Dragon Suede Trainers SIZE in SIZE Trainers 6 BB2487 BLACK/WHITE shoes 7e92e9

Adidas Originals GS Dragon Suede Trainers SIZE in SIZE Trainers 6 BB2487  BLACK/WHITE shoes 7e92e9

Item specifics

New without box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or ... Read moreabout the condition
UK Shoe Size (Women's): 5.5 US Shoe Size (Women's): 6
Pattern: SOLID Product Line: adidas Originals


Material: Suede


Width: Medium (B, M)

Does not apply

U.S. Cities City-Data Forum Index
Search Forums  (Advanced)

Adidas Originals GS Dragon Suede Trainers SIZE in SIZE Trainers 6 BB2487 BLACK/WHITE shoes 7e92e9

Asics Mens Patriot 9 Neutral Running Shoes Black / Carbon / White,Asics Tartherzeal 5 [TJR288-3801] Men Running Shoes Lapis/White,adidas Duramo 9 Trace Maroon White Women Running Casual Shoes Sneakers BB7069ADIDAS WMNS STAN SMITH WONDER PINK Sneakers | CQ2812adidas Shoes 901618 White 23.5cm,ASICS Men's GEL-Unifire TR 2 Training Shoe - Choose SZ/Color,PUMA MANTRA FUSEFIT UNREST SNEAKERS NERO ARANCIONE 191395-01,PUMA Men's Mell Es Suga Cross-Training ShoeMetallic Blue/Fluorescent Peach7 M US,Puma Mens Pacer Next Net,Nike Air Max 95 Ultra SE ~ AO9082 022 ~ Size 11,|366593-02| Puma Shoes – Tsugi Jun Baroque white/white 2018 Men TextileNew Puma 306243 02 Future Cat Ultra Mercedes Black Men's Casual Shoes 11.5 US,Puma FAAS eVoSPEED STAR 2013 CASUAL / TRAINING SOCCER SHOES NEW ORANGE/CHR/GREEN,Puma Drift Cat 6 Trainers Leather Shoes Suede Shoes 305101 01Asics Gellyte NS H8D4N9090 black halfshoesPuma Tsugi Jun Mens Sneaker Sport Shoes Athletic Trainer Black,hombre Asics Gel-Lyte V - h60sq2323 - Zapatillas Rojas,Asics Tiger GEL-Lyte III [H7L3L-9096] Men Casual Shoes Black/Glacier Grey,ASICS Men's GEL-Nimbus 20 Running Shoes,Vans SK8-Hi Canvas Unisex-Adult Hi-Top Sneaker Black/Black 10 UK,Asics Gel-Lyte III Red/Black H6Y0L-2490 Men Size 10,Puma Ignite Mate & Brillo Zapatillas Hombre Para Correr Deportivas Unisex 359718,ASICS GEL MAI SZ 9.5 PROVINCIAL BLUE DARK BLUE H812L 4249,VANS scarpe U Iso 1.5 (Mesh) black unisex nero,Asics GEL-Kayano 25 [1011A019-021] Men Running Shoes Glacier Grey/BlackNike Tanjun Trainers Mens Black/Black Sports Shoes Sneakers Footwear,Floris van Bommel 10841/10, Men’s Hi-Top Shoes Brown (Brown) 8.5,Puma Men’s 9.5 Running Training Shoes cmc-0604Asics Hyper Md 6, Unisex Adults Track & Field Shoes 9 UK,Asics GEL-Nimbus 20 [T800N-004] Men Running Shoes Black/Neon Lime
Location: Lethbridge, AB
1,132 posts, read 1,594,386 times
Reputation: 974
Mostly because fighting's been a part of hockey for its entire history as a sport, so anyone wanting to ban fighting in hockey is pushing against an entrenched tradition, whereas the opposite is true in basketball.

As well, given its long history in hockey, fighting is governed by a fairly stringent set of official and unofficial rules (for example, it's considered proper fighting etiquette to remove a visor if you're wearing one, or perhaps most important - if a player refuses to drop the gloves, there's no fight)

Fighting also serves as an unofficial deterrent to dirty play. That's one of the primary duties of an enforcer on a team - to ensure that their team mates do not have to put up with that sort of play (Running a goalie, for example is almost a surefire way to start a fight).

Given that basketball has no history of fighting, and no real rules to govern it (official or unofficial) and much more stringent rules in regards to physical play it doesn't make a lot of sense to suddenly include fighting.
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,024 posts, read 10,083,339 times
Reputation: 8860
I'll tell you this.... Since the league has clamped down on fighting with the instagator rule the game has gotten a lot more dangerous. Back in the day when you Did something really dirty to your opponent you had better drop those gloves because you were going to have to fight for sure. Nowadays we see all kinds of dirty whimps out there running around the ice and injuring players and these guys refuse to fight. Well in the old days you would have got your lights punched out whether you wanted to fight or not. Retaliation, was the name of the game and it made it safer for the clean players.
Old 04-07-2011, 08:13 PM
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,346 posts, read 80,485,974 times
Reputation: 17405
Invalid question. Hockey players are not allowed to fight.

The real question is, "Why doesn't fighting int he NHL result in much harsher penalties?" Are fights this common in Europe or Russia?

Also, fist blows in hockey can't be delivered with as much force because a player has less ability to use his body and legs since he is on skates.

If I had it my way, fighting in the NHL would result in penalties equivalent to those in all other team sports. Hard checks could still be delivered just like hard hits in football can still be delivered.
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because the NBA is better run and the NHL is circling the bowl by comparison.

Hey, let's get all our stars hurt! yay! That will help our sport grow right?

I would love to see some enforcer on an NHL team learn how to really fight and put an arm lock on a guy and dislocate his elbow etc. Seriously, they've let guys smash other guys throats and heads with sticks and end peoples careers this way....I mean at what point do we just send them out there without goals or pucks and let them just fight?
Location: Kansas City, MO
5,758 posts, read 9,455,177 times
Reputation: 2790
I've played roller hockey and I have seen guys hospitalized after getting punched one time. If you know how to handle yourself on skates, you can punch just fine.
04-08-2011, 04:57 PM
I've played hockey and been a hockey fan for over 40 years. However I am a guy who has always had hockey as a secondary sport. Having laid that groundwork, there is fighting in the NHL because there is a tradition of it, as another poster said. However these days fighting has its problems. Helmets, an addition to the NHL after the advent of common fighting, creates problems. A punch to the helmet can do more damage to the hand than to the helmeted head being hit. Consequently some fighters take it easy when the helmet is likely to be hit. And visors, which might become manditory someday soon, will create yet more problems for the fighting hockey player.

To tell you the truth, I think they could ban fighting in the NHL and the sport could survive just fine. The heirarchy is probably unwilling to take the gamble. And given hockey is a secondary "major" sport in the US (but bigger than soccer, so far), it would be a gamble.
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because hockey fights are entertaining.

Basketball fights just look ridiculous.
Location: Tall Building down by the river
39,615 posts, read 48,179,614 times
Reputation: 9451

Why do the NBA fights look ridiculous?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site:

Closed Thread

All times are GMT -6.