Nike WH7-Nike_Lunarcharge_Premium_127 sneaker - Heren - sneaker kleur Beige BE bbe3f4

Nike WH7-Nike_Lunarcharge_Premium_127 sneaker - Heren - sneaker kleur Beige BE bbe3f4

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Geslacht: Heren
Seizoen: Lente/Zomer Merk: Nike
Stijl: Zie de beschrijving Model:


Thema: Zie de beschrijving MPN:


Type: Sneaker Overheersende kleur: Beige
Type maat: Regolare
U.S. Cities City-Data Forum Index
Search Forums  (Advanced)

Nike WH7-Nike_Lunarcharge_Premium_127 sneaker - Heren - sneaker kleur Beige BE bbe3f4

Asics Gel Lyte III 3 White/Black Lumberjack H6Y0L 0190 Men's SZ 6.5,Nike Air Max 97 Bronze Desert Dust Size 10.5 Brand New With Box Shoes Stock XPuma BMW MS Drift Cat 7 VII Black Men Motorsport Casual Shoes Sneakers 305986-04,Nike NSW Skystepper Dusty Grey/Metallic Pewter-Laser Orange 599277-004 SZ 10Men Athletic Sneakers Puma Running Shoes Tsugi Netfit evoKNIT Camo Gray 36637001,Puma X INCY -,Asics Onitsuka Tiger Mexico 66 (Black Spray/White),Puma Trinomic XT2 Plus Black 357006 01 Men's SZ 11PUMA Men's RBR Mechs Ignite V3 Sneaker, Grey, Size 10.5 US / 10 UK,asics Japan asics Tiger GEL-LIQUE TQ6K0L LIGHT OLIVE x LIGHT OLIVE2018 Air Jordan 11 XI Retro Low OG 528895-003 size 11 Cool medium Grey gunsmoke,1989 Nike Zoom Street rare vintage shoesAsics GT-2000 6 [T805N-4549] Men Running Shoes Navy/Blue-Orange,Asics Men's fuzeX Rush Black/Carbon Running Shoes T718N.9097 NEW!,New Men's Asics GEL SUPERION T7H2N Indigo Blue/Silver/Black Running Shoes Sz10.5New Balance ml373blu Sneaker Blue 180692Puma Ferrari F1 2007 Team Running Sneakers Shoes Men's Size 12,Asics Gel Lyte III MT Carbon Gray Blue Trail Running Shoes HL7Z1-9797 Size 8,ASICS-ONITSUKA TIGER - TIGER ALLY (D701L-0202) - SIZE 12 - 40% OFF,Adidas ZX FLUX W Smooth Women Sneaker Women's Shoes Shoes Running,Asics Gel Diablo x Ronnie Fieg Kith Volcano 2.0 Size 9.5PUMA DRIFT CAT 5 WHITE ROSSO CORSO us $149adidas RESPONSE STABILITY 5 WOMEN'S RUNNING TRAINER WHITE FITNESS GYM NEW BNWT,SCHUHE ASICS ONITSUKA TIGER GEL LYTE 3 III-V LEDER SCHUHE BEGRENZTNike Air Shake Ndestrukt Men's Trainers Triple White RRP .99Asics men's running shoes gel nimbus 17 lite show flash yellow silver size 11.5PUMA Men's Bmw MS Drift Cat 5 Ultra Walking Shoe - Choose SZ/Color,Asics men's gel quantum 360 knit running shoes peacoat directoire blue size 11.5,VANS CHUKKA BOOT LX OAKLAND ATHLETICS A'S BOWS & ARROWS JERSEY BLACK GREEN 48 10Asics Onitsuka Tiger Mexico 66 Zapatos Retro Zapatilla Deportiva Gris D832L-9058,
Location: Lethbridge, AB
1,132 posts, read 1,594,386 times
Reputation: 974
Mostly because fighting's been a part of hockey for its entire history as a sport, so anyone wanting to ban fighting in hockey is pushing against an entrenched tradition, whereas the opposite is true in basketball.

As well, given its long history in hockey, fighting is governed by a fairly stringent set of official and unofficial rules (for example, it's considered proper fighting etiquette to remove a visor if you're wearing one, or perhaps most important - if a player refuses to drop the gloves, there's no fight)

Fighting also serves as an unofficial deterrent to dirty play. That's one of the primary duties of an enforcer on a team - to ensure that their team mates do not have to put up with that sort of play (Running a goalie, for example is almost a surefire way to start a fight).

Given that basketball has no history of fighting, and no real rules to govern it (official or unofficial) and much more stringent rules in regards to physical play it doesn't make a lot of sense to suddenly include fighting.
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,024 posts, read 10,083,339 times
Reputation: 8860
I'll tell you this.... Since the league has clamped down on fighting with the instagator rule the game has gotten a lot more dangerous. Back in the day when you Did something really dirty to your opponent you had better drop those gloves because you were going to have to fight for sure. Nowadays we see all kinds of dirty whimps out there running around the ice and injuring players and these guys refuse to fight. Well in the old days you would have got your lights punched out whether you wanted to fight or not. Retaliation, was the name of the game and it made it safer for the clean players.
Old 04-07-2011, 08:13 PM
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,346 posts, read 80,485,974 times
Reputation: 17405
Invalid question. Hockey players are not allowed to fight.

The real question is, "Why doesn't fighting int he NHL result in much harsher penalties?" Are fights this common in Europe or Russia?

Also, fist blows in hockey can't be delivered with as much force because a player has less ability to use his body and legs since he is on skates.

If I had it my way, fighting in the NHL would result in penalties equivalent to those in all other team sports. Hard checks could still be delivered just like hard hits in football can still be delivered.
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because the NBA is better run and the NHL is circling the bowl by comparison.

Hey, let's get all our stars hurt! yay! That will help our sport grow right?

I would love to see some enforcer on an NHL team learn how to really fight and put an arm lock on a guy and dislocate his elbow etc. Seriously, they've let guys smash other guys throats and heads with sticks and end peoples careers this way....I mean at what point do we just send them out there without goals or pucks and let them just fight?
Location: Kansas City, MO
5,758 posts, read 9,455,177 times
Reputation: 2790
I've played roller hockey and I have seen guys hospitalized after getting punched one time. If you know how to handle yourself on skates, you can punch just fine.
04-08-2011, 04:57 PM
I've played hockey and been a hockey fan for over 40 years. However I am a guy who has always had hockey as a secondary sport. Having laid that groundwork, there is fighting in the NHL because there is a tradition of it, as another poster said. However these days fighting has its problems. Helmets, an addition to the NHL after the advent of common fighting, creates problems. A punch to the helmet can do more damage to the hand than to the helmeted head being hit. Consequently some fighters take it easy when the helmet is likely to be hit. And visors, which might become manditory someday soon, will create yet more problems for the fighting hockey player.

To tell you the truth, I think they could ban fighting in the NHL and the sport could survive just fine. The heirarchy is probably unwilling to take the gamble. And given hockey is a secondary "major" sport in the US (but bigger than soccer, so far), it would be a gamble.
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because hockey fights are entertaining.

Basketball fights just look ridiculous.
Location: Tall Building down by the river
39,615 posts, read 48,179,614 times
Reputation: 9451

Why do the NBA fights look ridiculous?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site:

Closed Thread

All times are GMT -6.