Nike Lunarcharge Premium 923281 001 Black/MTLC Bronze Black/MTLC Eur 47.5 763c84

Nike Lunarcharge Premium  923281 001  Black/MTLC  Bronze  Black/MTLC Eur 47.5 763c84

Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Upper Material: Suede
Brand:

Nike

MPN:

923281-001

Product ID: 923281-001 Style: Running Shoes
Lining: Textile Main Colour: black metallic red bronze 001
Shoe Size: UK 12 Sole: Rubber
EU Shoe Size: 47.5
U.S. Cities City-Data Forum Index
Search Forums  (Advanced)

Nike Lunarcharge Premium 923281 001 Black/MTLC Bronze Black/MTLC Eur 47.5 763c84

Zapatos ASICS Hombre GRIGIO Cuero natural H7M4L-9595SPuma vintage shoes very rare edition US8.5 EU41 UK7.5Nike Air Zoom Talaria Mid Flyknit Premium Palm Green/Legion 875784-300,Puma Mens Vigor Running Shoes Blue (True Blue-blue Danube 01) 7 UK,Brand New Vans Vault UA Authentic Vincent Van Gogh Sunflower Size,PUMA Mens Basket Classic Cvs Fashion Sneaker- Pick SZ/Color.,Scarpe Uomo/Donna Vans Flame Wall Black & Red dal n°39 al n°47 New 2018,Puma Basket Whisper “Careaux Collaboration” Shoes 362712 02 US 12- New,ASIC Men's Gel-Nimbus GlacierGrey/Silver/White Running ShoesShoes PUMA Man NERO Suede 361372-01,PUMA MCQ DISC BLACK SZ 9.5 BLACK HEAVENLY PINK TAWNY PORT 358937 01,ASICS Men's FuzeX Knit Running Shoe Dark Blue/Black/Cherry Tomato Sneakers,PUMA Men's Roma Basic White/New Navy Sneakers,adidas CF Qtflex Womens Running Shoes Girls Sneakers AQ1622,Adidas Top Ten Hi Craft Chili/Unity Orange B27509 Men's SZ 9.5Puma Calzado de Seguridad Velocity 2.0 Negro Low S3 ESD Hro Src 643840,Asics GT-1000 6 4E [T7B1N-9007] Men Running Shoes Black/Safety Yellow,Puma Tsugi Shinsei Nbk Plasma-Glacier Gray Sneakers Size 12 36573801,asics 24 kilates Gel Lite solebox rare KithASICS Noosa FF - Blue - Mens,PUMA RS-0 Game Error / 367970-01 / Men's RS 80s Multi-Color Vintage Video Arcade,Asics Onitsuka Tiger Corsair Vin Grey Red Men Vintage Casual Shoes D7C2N-9626,Mens ASICS GEL-LYTE III King Fisher Suede Trainers H6U2Y 4848,Adidas Men's Originals Tubular Shadow CK Primeknit Shoes Sneakers Black - AQ1091Puma Turin Synthetic Leather Casual Shoes Mens Black 11 NWT 36011606,Adidas NMD R1 PK AQ0899 Size 5,Asics Gel Lyte III 3 Black/Black Galaxy H6U2Y 9090 Men's,Asics Gel Nimbus 17 NYC Marathon Freedom Men's Running Shoes Graffiti 13,New Men's Peanuts x Vans Half Cab Snoopy Family Classic Skateboard Shoes Size 12,Asics Men's Gel-Ds Trainer 22 Ankle-High Training Shoes
 
 
Location: Lethbridge, AB
1,132 posts, read 1,594,386 times
Reputation: 974
Mostly because fighting's been a part of hockey for its entire history as a sport, so anyone wanting to ban fighting in hockey is pushing against an entrenched tradition, whereas the opposite is true in basketball.

As well, given its long history in hockey, fighting is governed by a fairly stringent set of official and unofficial rules (for example, it's considered proper fighting etiquette to remove a visor if you're wearing one, or perhaps most important - if a player refuses to drop the gloves, there's no fight)

Fighting also serves as an unofficial deterrent to dirty play. That's one of the primary duties of an enforcer on a team - to ensure that their team mates do not have to put up with that sort of play (Running a goalie, for example is almost a surefire way to start a fight).

Given that basketball has no history of fighting, and no real rules to govern it (official or unofficial) and much more stringent rules in regards to physical play it doesn't make a lot of sense to suddenly include fighting.
 
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,024 posts, read 10,083,339 times
Reputation: 8860
I'll tell you this.... Since the league has clamped down on fighting with the instagator rule the game has gotten a lot more dangerous. Back in the day when you Did something really dirty to your opponent you had better drop those gloves because you were going to have to fight for sure. Nowadays we see all kinds of dirty whimps out there running around the ice and injuring players and these guys refuse to fight. Well in the old days you would have got your lights punched out whether you wanted to fight or not. Retaliation, was the name of the game and it made it safer for the clean players.
 
Old 04-07-2011, 08:13 PM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,346 posts, read 80,485,974 times
Reputation: 17405
Quote:
Invalid question. Hockey players are not allowed to fight.

The real question is, "Why doesn't fighting int he NHL result in much harsher penalties?" Are fights this common in Europe or Russia?

Also, fist blows in hockey can't be delivered with as much force because a player has less ability to use his body and legs since he is on skates.

If I had it my way, fighting in the NHL would result in penalties equivalent to those in all other team sports. Hard checks could still be delivered just like hard hits in football can still be delivered.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because the NBA is better run and the NHL is circling the bowl by comparison.

Hey, let's get all our stars hurt! yay! That will help our sport grow right?

I would love to see some enforcer on an NHL team learn how to really fight and put an arm lock on a guy and dislocate his elbow etc. Seriously, they've let guys smash other guys throats and heads with sticks and end peoples careers this way....I mean at what point do we just send them out there without goals or pucks and let them just fight?
 
Location: Kansas City, MO
5,758 posts, read 9,455,177 times
Reputation: 2790
Quote:
I've played roller hockey and I have seen guys hospitalized after getting punched one time. If you know how to handle yourself on skates, you can punch just fine.
 
04-08-2011, 04:57 PM
I've played hockey and been a hockey fan for over 40 years. However I am a guy who has always had hockey as a secondary sport. Having laid that groundwork, there is fighting in the NHL because there is a tradition of it, as another poster said. However these days fighting has its problems. Helmets, an addition to the NHL after the advent of common fighting, creates problems. A punch to the helmet can do more damage to the hand than to the helmeted head being hit. Consequently some fighters take it easy when the helmet is likely to be hit. And visors, which might become manditory someday soon, will create yet more problems for the fighting hockey player.

To tell you the truth, I think they could ban fighting in the NHL and the sport could survive just fine. The heirarchy is probably unwilling to take the gamble. And given hockey is a secondary "major" sport in the US (but bigger than soccer, so far), it would be a gamble.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because hockey fights are entertaining.

Basketball fights just look ridiculous.
 
 
Location: Tall Building down by the river
39,615 posts, read 48,179,614 times
Reputation: 9451
Quote:

Why do the NBA fights look ridiculous?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread



All times are GMT -6.