Authentic New Atmos Puma x Puma Atmos Clyde Created Ibis US Size 7 NEW 62e9b7

Authentic New Atmos Puma x Puma Atmos Clyde Created Ibis US Size 7  NEW 62e9b7

Item specifics

Condition:
New without box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand:

Puma

Color:

Pink

Style: Athletic Sneakers
Euro Size: EUR 39 US Shoe Size (Men's): 7
Material: Suede UPC:

Does not apply

U.S. Cities City-Data Forum Index
Search Forums  (Advanced)

Authentic New Atmos Puma x Puma Atmos Clyde Created Ibis US Size 7 NEW 62e9b7

Asics Unisex Adults' Gel-Hunter 3 R557y-4901 Cross Trainers, Bleu/Blanc/Rose,PUMA Men's Reverb Cross-Trainer Shoe,PUMA Tsugi Netfit Y&R - Choose SZ/Color,Puma Suede Classic+ Zinfandel Bordeaux Classic Pallacanestro,Vans Sk8-hi - Alta MTE Frost Grigio/Balistico Tgl 39 45 Stivali Invernali Scarpe,Asics Men’s Curreo Ii Running Shoes Green (Aloe / Black) 4 UK,MEN'S PUMA TSUGI DISC Midnight Sneakers Training Shoes 363764 02 Size 11.5,Puma IGNITE Evoknit Low lo 189904-05 White Grey Training Sneaker mens414571-104 Air Jordan 13 Retro "He Got Game" 2018 Men GS USA Size 100% Authentic,Asics Gel-Tactic Volleyball Shoes Indoor shoes trainers sneakersNike Air Huarache LE, Limited Edition, 1, 90, 95 Size 9 UK ** Cedar Black **,Vans Classic Slip-On "Marvel's Avengers - Spiderman" - VN0A38F79H7PUMA CHAUSSURE ENZO WEAVE - BLK - 11 (4059506460357),Women Adidas S79852 ZX Flex Running shoes black white sneakers,PUMA Men's Ignite Limitless Sr-71 Unrest Sneaker - Choose SZ/ColorVans Mens Iso 2 Low-Top Sneakers Brown 6.5 UK,Puma ST Runner Nubuck Leather Trainers Mens Grey/White Athletic Sneakers Shoes,[Adidas] BB3160 Energy Cloud Wtc Women Running Shoes Sneakers Black,Puma Trinomic XS 850 Mi Turbulence/Black 357028 02 Men's SZ 8.5PUMA Men's Cell Surin 2 Matte Cross-Trainer Shoe - Choose SZ/ColorNike Free RN 2017 Run Wolf Grey Blue Men Running Shoes Trainers 880839-006,Puma R698 Modern Athletic Men's Shoes Size 7.5,Vans x A Tribe Called Quest Sk8 Hi Pack ATCQ Bonita Applebum White Red Size 7,Asics Gel-Kayano Tiger Mens's Sz 5.5 Trainer Knit Running Shoe HN7Q4 Multi-Color,VANS OLD SKOOL TOY STORY,363063-01 Puma Disc Blaze Desert Dusk Dark Navy Ribbon Red Size 10.5 (4498),PUMA Men's Suede Classic Mid Sneaker - Choose SZ/Color[asics] JOLT (4E) Super Wide Grey Ugly-shoes Men's Running Shoes T7NK4.09690,Adidas Womens Athletic Shoes Sz 11 US/Running LA Runner Purple Neon Green,PUMA Mid Vulc Shoes (Sz 11),
 
 
Location: Lethbridge, AB
1,132 posts, read 1,594,386 times
Reputation: 974
Mostly because fighting's been a part of hockey for its entire history as a sport, so anyone wanting to ban fighting in hockey is pushing against an entrenched tradition, whereas the opposite is true in basketball.

As well, given its long history in hockey, fighting is governed by a fairly stringent set of official and unofficial rules (for example, it's considered proper fighting etiquette to remove a visor if you're wearing one, or perhaps most important - if a player refuses to drop the gloves, there's no fight)

Fighting also serves as an unofficial deterrent to dirty play. That's one of the primary duties of an enforcer on a team - to ensure that their team mates do not have to put up with that sort of play (Running a goalie, for example is almost a surefire way to start a fight).

Given that basketball has no history of fighting, and no real rules to govern it (official or unofficial) and much more stringent rules in regards to physical play it doesn't make a lot of sense to suddenly include fighting.
 
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,024 posts, read 10,083,339 times
Reputation: 8860
I'll tell you this.... Since the league has clamped down on fighting with the instagator rule the game has gotten a lot more dangerous. Back in the day when you Did something really dirty to your opponent you had better drop those gloves because you were going to have to fight for sure. Nowadays we see all kinds of dirty whimps out there running around the ice and injuring players and these guys refuse to fight. Well in the old days you would have got your lights punched out whether you wanted to fight or not. Retaliation, was the name of the game and it made it safer for the clean players.
 
Old 04-07-2011, 08:13 PM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,346 posts, read 80,485,974 times
Reputation: 17405
Quote:
Invalid question. Hockey players are not allowed to fight.

The real question is, "Why doesn't fighting int he NHL result in much harsher penalties?" Are fights this common in Europe or Russia?

Also, fist blows in hockey can't be delivered with as much force because a player has less ability to use his body and legs since he is on skates.

If I had it my way, fighting in the NHL would result in penalties equivalent to those in all other team sports. Hard checks could still be delivered just like hard hits in football can still be delivered.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because the NBA is better run and the NHL is circling the bowl by comparison.

Hey, let's get all our stars hurt! yay! That will help our sport grow right?

I would love to see some enforcer on an NHL team learn how to really fight and put an arm lock on a guy and dislocate his elbow etc. Seriously, they've let guys smash other guys throats and heads with sticks and end peoples careers this way....I mean at what point do we just send them out there without goals or pucks and let them just fight?
 
Location: Kansas City, MO
5,758 posts, read 9,455,177 times
Reputation: 2790
Quote:
I've played roller hockey and I have seen guys hospitalized after getting punched one time. If you know how to handle yourself on skates, you can punch just fine.
 
04-08-2011, 04:57 PM
I've played hockey and been a hockey fan for over 40 years. However I am a guy who has always had hockey as a secondary sport. Having laid that groundwork, there is fighting in the NHL because there is a tradition of it, as another poster said. However these days fighting has its problems. Helmets, an addition to the NHL after the advent of common fighting, creates problems. A punch to the helmet can do more damage to the hand than to the helmeted head being hit. Consequently some fighters take it easy when the helmet is likely to be hit. And visors, which might become manditory someday soon, will create yet more problems for the fighting hockey player.

To tell you the truth, I think they could ban fighting in the NHL and the sport could survive just fine. The heirarchy is probably unwilling to take the gamble. And given hockey is a secondary "major" sport in the US (but bigger than soccer, so far), it would be a gamble.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because hockey fights are entertaining.

Basketball fights just look ridiculous.
 
 
Location: Tall Building down by the river
39,615 posts, read 48,179,614 times
Reputation: 9451
Quote:

Why do the NBA fights look ridiculous?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread



All times are GMT -6.