Puma Future Cat Super LT Men’s Men’s LT Size 13 Shoes Black /red Sneakers (s) c8d402

Puma Future Cat Super LT Men’s Men’s LT Size 13 Shoes Black /red Sneakers (s) c8d402

Item specifics

New without box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or ... Read moreabout the condition


Style: Athletics Model:

Puma Future Cat Super LT

Euro Size: EUR 47 Upper Material: Textile
Width: Medium (D, M) US Shoe Size (Men's): 13


Country/Region of Manufacture: Vietnam
U.S. Cities City-Data Forum Index
Search Forums  (Advanced)

Puma Future Cat Super LT Men’s Men’s LT Size 13 Shoes Black /red Sneakers (s) c8d402

New Men's Puma Ferrari Evo Cat - 306009-02 Black Training Sneaker,nike air vapormax size 6 UkAsics Onitsuka Tiger Mexico 66 Shoes Retro Leisure Leather Trainers AaronAsics Tiger Asics GEL LYTE V HN6A4-9011 Black mod. HN6A4-9011New Balance u 520 Ek Zapatos Retro Zapatillas Deportivas Scarlet Outerspace,Adidas Originals Women's Stan Smith Black Pale Nude BB5164 Size 10,Adidas SupernovaScarpe ASICS Uomo BLU T714N-4993S-BL,New Men's Running Shoes GEL-NIMBUS 20 TOKYO T8B1N-9090 - *LIMITED EDITION*,Asics Gel Lyte III Kimono Navy Denim Japan 9,5 us,Asics Gel-Lyte Iii Running Men's Shoes Size 12SCARPE ADIDAS DAILY 2.0 BIANCO-9½,Skechers Men's GOrun Mojo Radar Running Shoe Blue/Lime Fitness Shoes,Adidas Originals Swift Run PK Primeknit Women's Running Shoes Aqua White Size SZ,Asics Gt 2000 Running Men's Shoes Size 8,Zapatos PUMA Hombre ROSSO Gamuza,Tela 363132-005,Asics shoes men gel sendai 2 blue white orange size 10 us new with box,Asics GEL-Kayano 25 4E [1011A023-021] Men Running Shoes Glacier Grey/BlackPuma King Pro SG Mens Football Boots US 9 CM 27 REF 1825^,Asics GT-2000 6 Men's Running Shoe size: 13 Style: T8059-9001,Puma TSUGI DISC Shoes Unisex Sports Trainers Gray,womens adidas Basketball Shoe, 7 1/2 Crazy 8, Grey/ White, NIB!! Mid To High TopPuma Suede Mid X Stuck Black Alife 358866 01 Men's SZ 8.5,AO1023 301 NIKE AIR MAX 270 FLYKNIT OLIVE FLAK BLACK CARGO KHAKI WHITE 8-14,VANS �~ X-girl collaboration SK8-Hi US10 from japan (247,Puma x Staple Men Ignite Limitless black white,MEN'S SHOES SNEAKERS PUMA X NATUREL SUEDE [365675 02],PUMA Men's ST Evo Cross-Trainer ShoeAsics Women’s Gel-Excite 5 Running Shoes Blue 6.5 UKPuma Whirlwind Classic Mens White Green Grey Suede & Nylon Trainers - 8 UK
Location: Lethbridge, AB
1,132 posts, read 1,594,386 times
Reputation: 974
Mostly because fighting's been a part of hockey for its entire history as a sport, so anyone wanting to ban fighting in hockey is pushing against an entrenched tradition, whereas the opposite is true in basketball.

As well, given its long history in hockey, fighting is governed by a fairly stringent set of official and unofficial rules (for example, it's considered proper fighting etiquette to remove a visor if you're wearing one, or perhaps most important - if a player refuses to drop the gloves, there's no fight)

Fighting also serves as an unofficial deterrent to dirty play. That's one of the primary duties of an enforcer on a team - to ensure that their team mates do not have to put up with that sort of play (Running a goalie, for example is almost a surefire way to start a fight).

Given that basketball has no history of fighting, and no real rules to govern it (official or unofficial) and much more stringent rules in regards to physical play it doesn't make a lot of sense to suddenly include fighting.
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,024 posts, read 10,083,339 times
Reputation: 8860
I'll tell you this.... Since the league has clamped down on fighting with the instagator rule the game has gotten a lot more dangerous. Back in the day when you Did something really dirty to your opponent you had better drop those gloves because you were going to have to fight for sure. Nowadays we see all kinds of dirty whimps out there running around the ice and injuring players and these guys refuse to fight. Well in the old days you would have got your lights punched out whether you wanted to fight or not. Retaliation, was the name of the game and it made it safer for the clean players.
Old 04-07-2011, 08:13 PM
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,346 posts, read 80,485,974 times
Reputation: 17405
Invalid question. Hockey players are not allowed to fight.

The real question is, "Why doesn't fighting int he NHL result in much harsher penalties?" Are fights this common in Europe or Russia?

Also, fist blows in hockey can't be delivered with as much force because a player has less ability to use his body and legs since he is on skates.

If I had it my way, fighting in the NHL would result in penalties equivalent to those in all other team sports. Hard checks could still be delivered just like hard hits in football can still be delivered.
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because the NBA is better run and the NHL is circling the bowl by comparison.

Hey, let's get all our stars hurt! yay! That will help our sport grow right?

I would love to see some enforcer on an NHL team learn how to really fight and put an arm lock on a guy and dislocate his elbow etc. Seriously, they've let guys smash other guys throats and heads with sticks and end peoples careers this way....I mean at what point do we just send them out there without goals or pucks and let them just fight?
Location: Kansas City, MO
5,758 posts, read 9,455,177 times
Reputation: 2790
I've played roller hockey and I have seen guys hospitalized after getting punched one time. If you know how to handle yourself on skates, you can punch just fine.
04-08-2011, 04:57 PM
I've played hockey and been a hockey fan for over 40 years. However I am a guy who has always had hockey as a secondary sport. Having laid that groundwork, there is fighting in the NHL because there is a tradition of it, as another poster said. However these days fighting has its problems. Helmets, an addition to the NHL after the advent of common fighting, creates problems. A punch to the helmet can do more damage to the hand than to the helmeted head being hit. Consequently some fighters take it easy when the helmet is likely to be hit. And visors, which might become manditory someday soon, will create yet more problems for the fighting hockey player.

To tell you the truth, I think they could ban fighting in the NHL and the sport could survive just fine. The heirarchy is probably unwilling to take the gamble. And given hockey is a secondary "major" sport in the US (but bigger than soccer, so far), it would be a gamble.
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because hockey fights are entertaining.

Basketball fights just look ridiculous.
Location: Tall Building down by the river
39,615 posts, read 48,179,614 times
Reputation: 9451

Why do the NBA fights look ridiculous?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.

Closed Thread

All times are GMT -6.