Nike - Air Force 1 07 Dark Red Mens Trainers - Nike AA4083-603 804538

Nike - Air Force 1 07 Dark Red Mens Trainers - Nike AA4083-603 804538

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition


Upper Material: Leather & Synthetic Product Style: Air Force 1 07
Inner Material: Textile Style: Trainers
Fasterning: Lace Up Supplier Reference: AA4083-603
Sole: Rubber Gender: Mens
Colour: Dark Red
U.S. Cities City-Data Forum Index
Search Forums  (Advanced)

Nike - Air Force 1 07 Dark Red Mens Trainers - Nike AA4083-603 804538

Men's Nike Air Huarache Blue Moon Trainers US 12.5 318429-414,Nike Internationalist SE Medium Olive AJ2024-200 Size 9.5 UKSneaker Uomo Puma 366090-03,Nike SB Zoom Stefan Janoski Trainers Olive Branded Footwear,Nike Tennis Classic Ultra Flyknit,women's girls nike air max 95 running trainers shoes size 6 eur 40 us 8.5,Nike Classic Cortez Leather 833657-001 US 9.5 Wolf Grey,NIKE JORDAN MEN'S SHOES SZ 12 TRAINER ST PREMIUM 843732 103 WHITE / BLACK GOLD,ADIDAS ORIGINALS SUPERSTAR SFT SUEDE WOMEN'S RUNNING SHOE CG3353 US3.5-6.5 12',Women's Adidas NMD R1 STLT PrimeKnit Multi-Color CQ2028 ash pink orchid tintNike Roshe One Mens 511881-023 Wolf Grey White Mesh Running Shoes Size 10,Adidas ZX 700 w ba9981 NMD NEW 109,90 NPEmerica Shoes. Skateboard Shoes. Emerica The Hsu G6 x Chocolate Brown/White Shoe,Nike Air Force 1 SF AF1 Mid SZ  9  Ivory Mars Stone Special Field 917753-100,Shoes DIADORA 2.0 Man BEIGE Suede 170946-25077U,New Adidas NMD C2 Chukka Black Suede BY3011 NIB Size 13,Nike Men's Big High Basketball Shoe Midnight Navy/White,Shoes VANS Man BLU/BIANCO Fabric V003D7K77,PREOWNED NIKE AIR FORCE 1 LOW SUPREME sz 9.5 MOWABB PATTA PARRA Cherrywood ACG,New Balance NM420 Shoes - Forest/Gum,New Men's Nike SF AF1 Air Force 1 Desert Ochre Brown Orange Size 8.5 903270 778ADIDAS ORIGINALS EQT CUSHION ADV 11.5 CORE BLACK WHITE COLLEGIATE ROYAL CQ2374,Nike Air Shake Ndestrukt Men's sneakers 880869 002 Multiple sizes,Nike Roshe Run Rosherun GPX Vntg Green Tiger Camo Size 9 DS 555445 331,Nike Lunarepic Low Flyknit 2 II Grey Multi-Color Men Running Shoes 863779-003,Nike AIR MAX Men's Running Trainers Shoes SIZE 9.5,Sneaker Uomo Adidas BZ0033 Autunno/Inverno,Air Jordan XXXI 31 Black/Game Royal/White Size 12 Nike (845037-007) Sweet Kicks,Nike Men's Free Rn Distance Running Shoe size 11,Nike Lebron 13 XIII Low Men's Sz 12 basketball shoes blackout black 831925-001,
Location: Lethbridge, AB
1,132 posts, read 1,594,386 times
Reputation: 974
Mostly because fighting's been a part of hockey for its entire history as a sport, so anyone wanting to ban fighting in hockey is pushing against an entrenched tradition, whereas the opposite is true in basketball.

As well, given its long history in hockey, fighting is governed by a fairly stringent set of official and unofficial rules (for example, it's considered proper fighting etiquette to remove a visor if you're wearing one, or perhaps most important - if a player refuses to drop the gloves, there's no fight)

Fighting also serves as an unofficial deterrent to dirty play. That's one of the primary duties of an enforcer on a team - to ensure that their team mates do not have to put up with that sort of play (Running a goalie, for example is almost a surefire way to start a fight).

Given that basketball has no history of fighting, and no real rules to govern it (official or unofficial) and much more stringent rules in regards to physical play it doesn't make a lot of sense to suddenly include fighting.
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,024 posts, read 10,083,339 times
Reputation: 8860
I'll tell you this.... Since the league has clamped down on fighting with the instagator rule the game has gotten a lot more dangerous. Back in the day when you Did something really dirty to your opponent you had better drop those gloves because you were going to have to fight for sure. Nowadays we see all kinds of dirty whimps out there running around the ice and injuring players and these guys refuse to fight. Well in the old days you would have got your lights punched out whether you wanted to fight or not. Retaliation, was the name of the game and it made it safer for the clean players.
Old 04-07-2011, 08:13 PM
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,346 posts, read 80,485,974 times
Reputation: 17405
Invalid question. Hockey players are not allowed to fight.

The real question is, "Why doesn't fighting int he NHL result in much harsher penalties?" Are fights this common in Europe or Russia?

Also, fist blows in hockey can't be delivered with as much force because a player has less ability to use his body and legs since he is on skates.

If I had it my way, fighting in the NHL would result in penalties equivalent to those in all other team sports. Hard checks could still be delivered just like hard hits in football can still be delivered.
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because the NBA is better run and the NHL is circling the bowl by comparison.

Hey, let's get all our stars hurt! yay! That will help our sport grow right?

I would love to see some enforcer on an NHL team learn how to really fight and put an arm lock on a guy and dislocate his elbow etc. Seriously, they've let guys smash other guys throats and heads with sticks and end peoples careers this way....I mean at what point do we just send them out there without goals or pucks and let them just fight?
Location: Kansas City, MO
5,758 posts, read 9,455,177 times
Reputation: 2790
I've played roller hockey and I have seen guys hospitalized after getting punched one time. If you know how to handle yourself on skates, you can punch just fine.
04-08-2011, 04:57 PM
I've played hockey and been a hockey fan for over 40 years. However I am a guy who has always had hockey as a secondary sport. Having laid that groundwork, there is fighting in the NHL because there is a tradition of it, as another poster said. However these days fighting has its problems. Helmets, an addition to the NHL after the advent of common fighting, creates problems. A punch to the helmet can do more damage to the hand than to the helmeted head being hit. Consequently some fighters take it easy when the helmet is likely to be hit. And visors, which might become manditory someday soon, will create yet more problems for the fighting hockey player.

To tell you the truth, I think they could ban fighting in the NHL and the sport could survive just fine. The heirarchy is probably unwilling to take the gamble. And given hockey is a secondary "major" sport in the US (but bigger than soccer, so far), it would be a gamble.
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
It's called ENTERTAINMENT when the NHL players fight but when NBA players have the look of a possible fight the refs stop it before gets started.

Anyone know why?
Because hockey fights are entertaining.

Basketball fights just look ridiculous.
Location: Tall Building down by the river
39,615 posts, read 48,179,614 times
Reputation: 9451

Why do the NBA fights look ridiculous?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site:

Closed Thread

All times are GMT -6.